2017-10-10 Tuesday 2:37 PM MDNH
JOEYARNOLDVN
.
Pat said he would block me if I kept mentioning him. I continued, so he will probably block me on Facebook now: here is his FB URL link:
https://www.facebook.com/patrick.ramolla?fref=gc&dti=571147523042398&hc_location=ufi
.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/VietnamIsAwesome/permalink/941303452693468/?comment_id=942650932558720&reply_comment_id=942982109192269¬if_id=1507619829244135¬if_t=group_comment_mention
.
Remove
Joey Arnold Patrick Ramolla
is ignoring my hypothetical question and will only address things
through convenience, practicality, through subjective perspective,
perception reality, as opposed to ultimate eternal universal truth
objective invisible super mega awesome
perfect forever real real real real very real never ending so real
realistic reality reality reality reality reality which we cannot really
see nor hear nor feel nor understand well enough right now but in which
is real even if we cannot see it and stuff. I want to talk about what
we cannot talk about..... my question was about if I could be dead and
alive, actually, in reality, but Pat just wants to ponder the perception
of that as in the approach towards that.... and it is true that it is
hard to know if I am dead or not.... it is hard for you to know if I am
dead or not.... but the question is not about knowing if somebody is
dead or not.... the question is about the ability to be dead and alive
and not dead or alive..... it is not a question of "AM I DEAD OR ALIVE"
but a question of dualistic reality as described from the S CAT
THING...... the S CAT THING is something that does not make sense...... Trung N Huynh, can you be dead and alive?
Manage
Patrick Ramolla Joey Arnold
a) I wasn't ignoring your question at all
😂
b) I started ignoring YOU, because you're not fun to be around.
c) I am ignoring your political agenda bs - we had a philosophical debate about science and you made it about your political narrative, every time you had no arguments.
d) stop mentioning my name or I will block you!
Removea) I wasn't ignoring your question at all
😂b) I started ignoring YOU, because you're not fun to be around.
c) I am ignoring your political agenda bs - we had a philosophical debate about science and you made it about your political narrative, every time you had no arguments.
d) stop mentioning my name or I will block you!
Write a reply...
Joey Arnold Duck Duck Go over Google: try it:
Go to Duck Duck Go Dot Com:
DuckDuckGo.com
ManageGo to Duck Duck Go Dot Com:
DuckDuckGo.com
DuckDuckGo is the search engine that doesn't track you. We protect your search history from…
duckduckgo.com
Write a reply...
Write a reply...
Joey Arnold Patrick Ramolla
lied about me. He continues to lie about me. Pat said I am doing what I
am not doing. Pat said I am doing bad things. Pat is saying that I am
doing a political thing which is implied to be a bad thing. Now,
everything is political and religious. People think and say and feel and
believe like politics and religion is and are not everything. Religion
simply means what you believe. We all believe in stuff. Some have the
religion of no gods. That is a religions. We all have politics. But Pat
is trying to criminalize me. Pat is saying that I am doing things I am
not doing. Pat is saying I am not fun but I do not have to be fun. I am
not required to be fun. My question is about dualistic reality. Pat
talked about perception towards reality. Politics is related to people
and how to govern or live by yourself and/or with others and stuff.
There are very general definitions and applications to politics and
religions. I could argue and say I am not talking about politics and
religions to say that my argument is that more of science and philosophy
and stuff. I like my questions. But my questions were insulted as if I
was a little kid. I will continue to do what I do. I will always do what
I do because that is always better.
.
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment